AddDbContext or AddDbContextPool

asp.net CoreEntity Framework-Coreasp.net Core-2.0

asp.net Core Problem Overview


For Asp.net Core apps, which one do we have to use? AddDbContext or AddDbContextPool? According to EF Core documentation, AddDbContextPool provides high performance but the default Asp.net Core project templates use AddDbContext.

asp.net Core Solutions


Solution 1 - asp.net Core

The answer is here (under "DbContext pooling"): https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/what-is-new/ef-core-2.0#dbcontext-pooling

DbContext is not thread-safe. So you cannot reuse the same DbContext object for multiple queries at the same time (weird things happen). The usual solution for this has been to just create a new DbContext object each time you need one. That's what AddDbContext does.

However, there is nothing wrong with reusing a DbContext object after a previous query has already completed. That's what AddDbContextPool does. It keeps multiple DbContext objects alive and gives you an unused one rather than creating a new one each time.

Which one you use is up to you. Both will work. Pooling has some performance gains. However the documentation warns that if you use any private properties in your DbContext class that should not be shared between queries, then you should not use it. I imagine that's pretty rare though, so pooling should be appropriate in most cases.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
Questionvtfs271232View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - asp.net CoreGabriel LuciView Answer on Stackoverflow