ItemSize in DynamoDB

Amazon Dynamodb

Amazon Dynamodb Problem Overview


I'm trying to compute the size of an item in dynamoDB and I'm not able to understand the definition.

The definition I found : An item size is the sum of lengths of its attribute names and values (binary and UTF-8 lengths). So it helps if you keep attribute names short.

Does it mean that if I put a number in the database, example: 1 it'll take the size of an int? a long? a double? Will it take the same amount of space than 100 or 1000000 or it'll take only the size of the corresponding binary?

And what is the computing for String?

Is there someone that knows how to compute it?

Amazon Dynamodb Solutions


Solution 1 - Amazon Dynamodb

That's a non trivial topic indeed - You already quoted the somewhat sloppy definition from the Amazon DynamoDB Data Model:

> An item size is the sum of lengths of its attribute names and values > (binary and UTF-8 lengths).

This is detailed further down the page within Amazon DynamoDB Data Types a bit:

  • String - Strings are Unicode with UTF8 binary encoding.
  • Number - Numbers are positive or negative exact-value decimals and integers. A number can have up to 38 digits of precision after the decimal point, and can be between 10^-128 to 10^+126. The representation in Amazon DynamoDB is of variable length. Leading and trailing zeroes are trimmed.

A similar question than yours has been asked in the Amazon DynamoDB forum as well (see Curious nature of the "Number" type) and the answer from Stefano@AWS sheds more light on the issue:

> * The "Number" type has 38 digits of precision These are actual decimal > digits. So it can represent pretty large numbers, and there is no > precision loss. > * How much space does a Number value take up? Not too > much. Our internal representation is variable length, so the size is > correlated to the actual (vs. maximum) number of digits in the value. > Leading and trailing zeroes are trimmed btw. [emphasis mine]

Christopher Smith's follow up post presents more insights into the resulting ramifications regarding storage consumption and its calculation, he concludes:

> The existing API provides very little insight in to storage > consumption, even though that is part (admittedly not that > significant) of the billing. The only information is the aggregate > table size, and even that data is potentially hours out of sync.

While Amazon does not expose it's billing data via an API yet, they they'll hopefully add an option to retrieve some information regarding item size to the DynamoDB API at some point, as suggested by Christopher.

Solution 2 - Amazon Dynamodb

I found this answer in amazon developer forum answered by Clarence@AWS:

eg:-

"Item":{
"time":{"N":"300"},
"feeling":{"S":"not surprised"},
"user":{"S":"Riley"}
}

in order to calculate the size of the above object:

The item size is the sum of lengths of the attribute names and values, interpreted as UTF-8 characters. In the example, the number of bytes of the item is therefore the sum of

Time : 4 + 3 
Feeling : 7 + 13 
User : 4 + 5          

Which is 36

For the formal definition, refer to: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/WorkingWithDDItems.html

Solution 3 - Amazon Dynamodb

An item’s size is the sum of all its attributes’ sizes, including the hash and range key attributes. Attributes themselves have a name and a value. Both the name and value contribute to an attribute’s size. Names are sized the same way as string values. All values are sized differently based on their data type.

If you're interested in the nitty-gritty details, have a read of this blog post.

Otherwise, I've also created a DynamoDB Item Size and Consumed Capacity Calculator that accurately determines item sizes.

Numbers are easily DynamoDB's most complicated type. AWS does not publicly document how to determine how many bytes are in a number. They say this is so they can change the internal implementation without anyone being tied to it. What they do say, however, sounds simple but is more complicated in practice.

Very roughly, though, the formula is something like 1 byte for every 2 significant digits, plus 1 extra byte for positive numbers or 2 for negative numbers. Therefore, 27 is 2 bytes and -27 is 3 bytes. DynamoDB will round up if there’s an uneven amount of digits, so 461 will use 3 bytes (including the extra byte). Leading and trailing zeros are trimmed before calculating the size.

Solution 4 - Amazon Dynamodb

You can use the algorithm for computing DynamoDB item size in the DynamoDB Storage Backend for Titan DynamoDBDelegate class.

Solution 5 - Amazon Dynamodb

All the above answers skip the issue of storing length of attributes as well as length of attribute names and the type of each attribute.

The DynamoDB Naming Guide says names can be 1 to 255 characters long which implies a 1 byte name length overhead.

We can work back from the 400kb maximum item limit to know there's an upper limit on the length required for binary or string items - they don't need to store more than a 19bit number for the length.

Using a bit of adaptive coding, I would expect:

  • Numbers have a 1 byte leading type and length value but could also be coded into a single byte (eg: a special code for a Zero value number, with no value bytes following)
  • String and binary have 1-3 bytes leading type and length
  • Null is just a type byte without a value
  • Bool is a pair of type bytes without any other value
  • Collection types have 1-3 bytes leading type and length.

Oh, and DynamoDB is not schemaless. It is schema-per-item because it's storing the types, names and lengths of all these variable length items.

Solution 6 - Amazon Dynamodb

An approximation to how much an item occupies in your DynamoDB table is to do a get petition with the boto3 library.

This is not an exact solution on to which is the size of an element, but it will help you to make an idea. When performing a batch_get_item(**kwargs) you get a response that includes the ConsumedCapacity in the following form:

....
'ConsumedCapacity': [
    {
        'TableName': 'string',
        'CapacityUnits': 123.0,
        'ReadCapacityUnits': 123.0,
        'WriteCapacityUnits': 123.0,
        'Table': {
            'ReadCapacityUnits': 123.0,
            'WriteCapacityUnits': 123.0,
            'CapacityUnits': 123.0
        },
        'LocalSecondaryIndexes': {
            'string': {
                'ReadCapacityUnits': 123.0,
                'WriteCapacityUnits': 123.0,
                'CapacityUnits': 123.0
            }
        },
        'GlobalSecondaryIndexes': {
            'string': {
                'ReadCapacityUnits': 123.0,
                'WriteCapacityUnits': 123.0,
                'CapacityUnits': 123.0
            }
        }
    },
]
...

From there you can see how much capacity units it took and you can extract and aproximated size of the item. Obviously this is based in your configuration of the system due to the fact that:

> One read request unit represents one strongly consistent read request, or two eventually consistent read requests, for an item up to 4 KB in size. Transactional read requests require 2 read request units to perform one read for items up to 4 KB. If you need to read an item that is larger than 4 KB, DynamoDB needs additional read request units. The total number of read request units required depends on the item size, and whether you want an eventually consistent or strongly consistent read.

Solution 7 - Amazon Dynamodb

The simplest approach will be to create a item in the table and export the item to csv file which is a option available in DynamoDB. The size of the csv file will give you the item size approximately.

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMikeView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - Amazon DynamodbSteffen OpelView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - Amazon DynamodbAsanga DewaguruView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - Amazon DynamodbZac CharlesView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - Amazon DynamodbAlexander PatrikalakisView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - Amazon DynamodbAndy DentView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Amazon DynamodbDrubioView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - Amazon DynamodbPusarla ShahilView Answer on Stackoverflow